Todays Vampires vs. Old Vampires (films) Login to Kupika  or  Create a new account 


Todays Vampires vs. Old Vampires (films)

* guest posting enabled *

Pages:  1  2

23 April 2012, 04:39 PM   #1
Guest Poster
Nowadays, vampires are sparkly faggy fairies instead of vampires and fairies are pretty
badass. They are mischievous and sick and twisted yet so sexy. Vampires give faeries a bad

Old vampires, vampires could not go out in sunlight or else they would burn up within
seconds. They could not go in running water. They were weak to garlic, steak, holy water,
etc. AND THEY DRANK BLOOD like the average sanguine vampire. 

No one knows about Dracula anymore and it makes me depressed. :'( I especially hate
hearing girls say they like vampires yet they ONLY vampire film they have seen is

As I have said many times Twilight is the worst film ever created and the producers should
gtfo. They made good actors into crappy ones. They could make actually good vampire films
but then Twilight existed. That movie should have never existed.

23 April 2012, 06:15 PM   #2
Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 84
No offense, but Dark Shadows is finally bringing back the classic vampire to me.

23 April 2012, 06:26 PM   #3
Guest Poster
Yeah but how many preps are gonna go see it? Unless they like Johnny Depp they won't go
cause they are stupid like that.

23 April 2012, 06:40 PM   #4
The Founder
Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Posts: 354
Last edited by ‹Wonderlust King›, 24 April 2012
Ehhh you can't judge it by old vampires vs new vampires every vampire story has it's own
lore behind it

23 April 2012, 06:42 PM   #5
Guest Poster
Twilight has nothing to do with vampire lore. Its just a bunch of fags trying to make
money ><

23 April 2012, 11:26 PM   #6
Guest Poster
Fuck Twilight You Twihard's If you Like or love Twilight Then your a fagg!

24 April 2012, 02:25 AM   #7
New Admin and Owner
Joined: 24 Feb 2012
Posts: 88
*Clap clap clap clap*

29 April 2012, 01:47 PM   #8
Guest Poster
I totally agree with you! I swear if you went to my school we'd be best friends because
every girl at my school is a prep like that other than one girl I hang out with sometimes.
MY friends are always talking about Twilight, I try to explain why those vampires don't
make any sense, and they come back with "well stephanie meyer was being creative she
doesn't have to go by the book" Well her "vampires" stray so far away from the original
vampire teenages once loved because they loved to hate dracula, that she should've just
called them "evil human-sized fairies" or some name of her own for these faggot creatures.
Even then I wouldn't be interested, even if there were no vampires or werewolves and all
the people were humans I would dislike it because the story line is pure crap. I also
noticed that the majority of people I know that are Twilight fans hate Harry Potter, when
I ask them why they don't talk about charecter development or plot issues or
classification issues like I talk about when I critisize twilight, they just say that it's
"too hard to follow" or it just "doesn't make sense" They tell me to read Twilight-I tell
them I've read parts and I'll try to read them so I can critisize better, but after the
first few paragraphs of any book I want to cry from the extreme waste of paper I'm
reading. I tell them to read Harry Potter-They tell me they've tried and it's too hard.
The only person I know who likes Twilight and Harry Potter goes to another school and
she's smart. If it's ok for Stephanie Meyer to call her faggot fairy creatures "vampires"
Then J.K Rowling should've called her Threstrals "pegasus". Sure, they're skeltal, can
only be seen by those that have seen death, and arevery different from the original,
graceful pegausus, but they're kind of like horses and they fly right? NO. So they have a
made-up name. Maybe Dementors could have been Ghouls, they're dark, blind, suck on
people's souls....but they're mean and they float right? NO. Creativity requires more
imagination. Well I'm done with my rant now, I'm off to go burn some Twilight books...

29 April 2012, 01:57 PM   #9
Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 84
And if she was REALLY creative, she could of called them something else instead of
calling them 'vampires'.

29 April 2012, 01:57 PM   #10
Guest Poster
If you don't want your vampires to have fangs? Fine. There is reality in that, and
in myth, not all had them. 
If you want your vampires to be able to procreate? Fine. It gets a little into the
twitardness of it, but there is such thing as a dhampir. Make it at least right.
If you want your vampires to sparkle...


29 April 2012, 05:55 PM   #11
Guest Poster
Oh I know about Dhampirs. I know about werepyres. Yeah but normally dhampir babies don't
eat the human mother from the inside out. From the actual series I would say Breaking Dawn
was the best. It actually reached OK. Only OK because it had sex in it and thats what REAL
romance novels/movies have. They are full of sex. I read House of Night and they had sex
everywhere. On the third chapter of the first book the boys ex girlfriend was giving him a

29 April 2012, 06:29 PM   #12
Guest Poster
I agree with everything that's been said but I don't think ALL vamoires today are bad.
Yes, Twilight can go jump in a hole and die but what about movies like Let The Right One
In? It's my favorite vampire movie of all time and it came out in like 2009, there's a
remake of it in AMerica called Let Me In which in my opinion is just as good.

29 April 2012, 06:37 PM   #13
Guest Poster
I prefer vampire books

30 April 2012, 11:28 PM   #14
Guest Poster
Haha, I agree with the sex. But most vampires don't actually have blood runing through
their body so edward could never have an erection   
And yes, any other vampire book or movie is awesome.

2 May 2012, 11:39 AM    #15
Guest Poster
Actually vampires have blood. Their blood is A LOT different than human blood but theyd o
have blood.

Pages:  1  2

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 PM.

About Kupika    Contact    FAQs    Terms of Service    Privacy Policy    Online Safety
Copyright © 2005-2012