L's Death Login to Kupika  or  Create a new account 
 


 

L's Death



Pages:  1  2  3  4  5  6

3 March 2009, 11:41 PM   #1
Guest Poster
What are your opinions about it? Should it or should it not have happened? Do you, like me, get the feeling L is going to come back (so he gets rid of Near, who actually really annoys me for some reason.)?

4 March 2009, 12:32 AM   #2
The Founder
Joined: 3 Mar 2009
Posts: 53
LOL, Amy, once someone dies they never come back. xD
Oh, and it totally SHOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED.

4 March 2009, 02:26 AM   #3
Guest Poster
It shouldn't have happened. If L isn't there to watch Light's back, Light turns goes from a cute psychopath to a freaky psychopath. They should have killed Misa instead. xDD

4 March 2009, 03:09 AM   #4
The Founder
Joined: 3 Mar 2009
Posts: 53
That's an excellent idea xD

4 March 2009, 03:09 PM   #5
Guest Poster
Jamie, nothing is impossible xD

4 March 2009, 05:30 PM   #6
The Founder
Joined: 3 Mar 2009
Posts: 53
L still kinda wins anyways 

4 March 2009, 05:35 PM   #7
Guest Poster
That's true :D

6 March 2009, 03:56 PM   #8
Guest Poster
Yeah he does. xD Cause eventually his efforts cause Light to break.

20 March 2009, 03:10 PM   #9
Ryuk~
Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 25
*posts on old post* 

Light sort of went downhill after L's death. L was his obstacle, what he put all his time
into. Once that was taken away, it was too easy for him. The lack of a challenge gave him
a swelled head, that's what changed him from : "Hey, I'm gonna change the world for the
better!" to "I AM GOD!"
Ryuk eat
s babies funny Pictures, Images and Photos

5 April 2009, 02:01 PM   #10
Guest Poster
neverendingdream,that part u are wrong.he planned to change the world from the very
beginning.although it is a little true he took things for granted after L's death.

        think of it this way,no one should be afraid if they did NOT commit crimes
punishable by law.

5 April 2009, 04:55 PM   #11
Guest Poster
L Shouldn't have died.

Death Note got crappier when he died.

WHY COULDN'T THEY HAVE KILLED MISA INSTEAD!!! THAT WAS A GREAT IDEA,
<alicewantsherjasper>

I prefer Light when he's not as nuts 

6 April 2009, 01:14 AM   #12
Ryuk~
Joined: 19 Mar 2009
Posts: 25
*snaps fingers* Don't tell me I'm wrong, boy.

Light : Good intentions, that end up corrupted.


His original idea was pretty damn grandiose: create a world without crime just by killing
criminals? That's the death penalty, and it hasn't worked in the real world. It doesn't
take a smart kid like Light to know that. Still, he thinks he can do something, so he
does. Good intentions and all.


I figure the point of no return is when he kills Lind L. Taylor, since he's the first
innocent victim (well, not really, but in Light's mind and such) and he was killed to
protect Light's utopia rather than to create it. After that, Light accrues more and more
collateral damage until the whole thing has an unstoppable inertia. Even if he wanted to
give up, I don't think he could have.


I think of the Death Note as a train that Light got on early in the series, and by the
time he understood that it was headed for a brick wall it was moving too fast to get off.
So he went crazy. He wasn't always a sociopath. He switched from wanting to rule his
utopia to wanting to be a god, which is the only way to beat death.

The way he died, being killed by Ryuk, was the only possible conclusion to his character
arc. Light wasn't really fighting Near or L or anyone else he took on...he was fighting
the Death Note (or death itself, whatever), and Ryuk was the embodiment of that
(indifferent, unconcerned by human values). If he'd been killed by the SPK or the NPA, the
story would have been about justice prevailing over crime, and if that was the only level,
it would have been kind of lame. Like Ryuk said a few times, good and evil are silly human
ideas, and that's the central theme of the series.

People are mistaken when they say his original intention was to eliminate criminals. No,
it was not. His METHOD was to kill criminals, but his original intentions were ALWAYS to
"create an utopia and reign as God".
Ryuk eat
s babies funny Pictures, Images and Photos

6 April 2009, 07:29 AM   #13
Guest Poster
hi im new to this guild and actually to kupika period but i just wanted to say that  i
don't  think that it should have but i was more on lights side

6 April 2009, 07:55 AM   #14
Guest Poster
*writes down "elmowilleatyou" on Death Note*

The cause of death should be suicide.

neverendingdream,regardless of what it is.everyone(most) would want a world FREE FROM
CRIMES.
i like L's method,but there would not be much impact.Kira's method on the other hand is
different.to begin with,one has nothing to fear of if they did not commit crimes.this is
the same as "mistakes" punishable by law.

and i would gladly live in his type of world.i have always dreamt of a crime free world
BEFORE the existence of death note.
Victims of HEINOUS crime would agree with me(most of them).

below would be my arguement why some criminals should be sentence to death. NOTE:this
argument of mine is supported by many law students from University of Cambridge and other
students from various university.

6 April 2009, 08:04 AM    #15
Guest Poster
1)KIRA(RAITO) is justice.imagine your YOURSELF/CHILD/FAMILY MEMBERS/YOUR LOVED ONEs(let
it be male or female,be open minded) RAPED/MURDERED/ASSAULTED/MOLESTED/ANYTHING EVIL THAT
U CAN THINK OF,WHAT WILL YOUR FEELINGS AND REACTION BE??

if the EVIDENCE isn’t sufficient,and those guilty one walks free,WILL U FEEL SAFE?HAVE U
EVER THOUGHT HE/SHE WILL SEEK REVENGE?DO U WANT TO LIVE IN SUCH PLACE WHERE THERE ARE
CONSTANT THREAT(s)?

A Royal Commissioner set up by the British Government finds that 63% of the convicts who
has been release HAVE THE TENDENCY to REPEAT the CRIMES
20%+ COMMITS OTHER CRIMES.

just 1 months ago,a girl aged 1 from malaysia was RAPED!!her parents left her in the care
of a close family,day-care-like,the day-care owner sons took advantage of their mother
absent,RAPED AND SODOMISED HER!!even if they are proven guilty,the law merely allow
maximum of 20 years of jail.DO U REALLY THINK THOSE SICKENING BASTARDS WILL LET HER LIVE
IN PEACE?and take NOTE:MOST CRIMINALS ARE NOT SENILE(unless proven)

HOW SURE ARE U THAT THOSE WHO ARE RELEASE WILL NOT COMMIT ANY MORE CRIMES?

AND IF I WERE TO TAKE SOMEONE ELSE LIVES AWAY,IT IS NOT ANOTHER MURDER CASE!!those
bastards took someone else live’s away(not in self-defense) without considering their
family members!!there was a case a man was murdered,he has to support 10 FAMILY
MEMBERS!!(including his parents who are IN THE HOSPITAL)do u think it is FAIR for the
court to send him to mere 10-20 years of jail?WHAT will happen to those innocent murdered
family members?without a bread-winner,who will feed them?YOU?THE GOVERNMENT?THE
PUBLIC?even if so,HOW MUCH CAN U PROVIDE?

AND KEEPING THESE BUNCH OF USELESS THRASH ALIVE is a WASTE OF PUBLIC FUNDS!!the ROYAL
COMMISSION(BRITISH) finds that keeping these CRIMINALS ALIVE cost them almost 30 MILLION
POUND STERLING a YEAR!!

I WOULD RATHER SPENT 30 MILLION POUND STERLING ON THE PUBLIC.EDUCATION,WELFARE,THE NEEDY
AND OLD,PUBLIC WORKS,HOSPITALS and ANYTHING that BENEFITS THE SOCIETY!!NOT ON THRASH WHO
COMMITTED HEINOUS CRIME(s)!!

I CAN BE CERTAIN,those money spent on the public by cutting off these thrash,10% of them
will BE GRATEFUL!!if not MORE.and I AM CERTAIN,out of that at LEAST 10 citizen(FROM
WHICHEVER COUNTRY) WILL BE USEFUL HUMAN BEING!if i can achieve 10 USEFUL HUMAN BEING,then
it is worth sacrificing all the thrash that BROUGHT NOTHING BUT
MISERY,PAIN,DISAPPOINTMENT,etc etc to the NATION,PUBLIC AND THE VICTIMS FAMILY!!

and i do not expect ALL citizen to be PERFECT SAINT,all i ASK FOR IS NOT TO COMMIT
CRIMES,is that too MUCH TO ASK FOR?

and TAKE NOTE EVERYONE WHO READS THIS:the figure i mention earlier WAS PER YEAR(30 million
pound sterling)!!is this any wonder WHY ECONOMIC MELTDOWN HAPPENS?

is it WORTH putting the ENTIRE NATION AND CITIZEN INTO HARD LIFE,just to keep this THRASH
ALIVE?is it FAIR for the people?the country? 

THINK OF IT THIS WAY,if a nation saves that kind of amount EVERY YEAR.FOR THE NEXT 20-30
YEARS,i am ALMOST certain,COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD would be richer,and they can provide
many thing for the DECENT HUMAN BEING.

ASIDE from that,the world would not suffer ECONOMIC RECESSION.In case anyone doubt my
ability,i scored an 'A' from Cambridge University in Business Studies.and out of 10
lecturers who i ask "do u think some criminals should be put to death?" only 1 say "no"

Pages:  1  2  3  4  5  6


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:09 AM.


About Kupika    Contact    FAQs    Terms of Service    Privacy Policy    Online Safety
Copyright © 2005-2012