Members online Login to Kupika  or  Create a new account 
 


 

Members online


* guest posting enabled *


Pages:  1  2

7 October 2008, 11:56 PM   #1
Guest Poster
Hina, I see you have changed the way we view Members online
Can you explain the difference in colors of people or is it just random?
Why not list them in alaphabet order instead of by country. Then it would be easier to
locate a person.

8 October 2008, 05:52 AM   #2
Lonely Heart
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 294
The colors are random.

Well, the idea is to meet new people, so it is better to group them by countries instead
of alphabets.
http://ariscool.com :: creates instant free web pages
-----
Being single is cool. No worrying about anyone, no obligations and best of all, no heartaches. But
you know what? If you will never get your heart broken, you will never learn to love.
-----
The best thing about loving and being hurt is that you get to know what true love really is. For as
gold is tested in fire, and so will love be perfected in pain.

8 October 2008, 06:06 AM   #3
Joined: 21 May 2008
Posts: 423
i think its a nice idea...but i think it would look better wiht the second grouping
underneath the colored names...and also with the colored names back to their old sizes or
someplace inbetween

as it is now, it makes it really hard to see all th e names on the left side which are
tiny now...so it almost makes them useless to even have anymore..

if you had them on top with the groupiings underneath it would be better and we could
always scroll down to find the groupings..

which since we have soem peeps that like to put their location as something other than
their true one are only partially accurate anyways...

12 October 2008, 12:32 PM   #4
Guest Poster
I like the old way better
I rather see them in alphabet order

12 October 2008, 01:02 PM   #5
Joined: 10 Oct 2007
Posts: 158
..What about having them alphabetical within the countries? O_o

12 October 2008, 03:31 PM   #6
Guest Poster
....With the countries listed alphabetical
lol

13 October 2008, 08:05 AM   #7
Lonely Heart
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 294
Ok, I have enlarged the font size.
The countries are now listed in alphabetical order.

The grouping is kept on the right so that it will be instantly noticeable.
If it were put at the bottom, it might not be seen by first-time members (who don't know
the grouping is even there because they don't scroll down the page).


"..What about having them alphabetical within the countries? O_o"

If this is implemented, then some people will always appear first (due to their nicknames
starting with a/b/c/...)
Not good...
http://ariscool.com :: creates instant free web pages
-----
Being single is cool. No worrying about anyone, no obligations and best of all, no heartaches. But
you know what? If you will never get your heart broken, you will never learn to love.
-----
The best thing about loving and being hurt is that you get to know what true love really is. For as
gold is tested in fire, and so will love be perfected in pain.

13 October 2008, 11:32 AM   #8
Guest Poster
But......but I wanna be first

It looks great Hina.....thanks for listening.....again

Your # 1

13 October 2008, 11:45 AM   #9
Joined: 10 Oct 2007
Posts: 158
Thanks hina, you're great. :D

Wouldn't _ be last-ish? xD

13 October 2008, 03:53 PM   #10
Joined: 14 Feb 2008
Posts: 366
Symbols would usually be first, I think.

Hina needs to accept my new account!

13 October 2008, 05:21 PM   #11
Guest Poster
Oh wow! I just noticed it! :O It looks awesome! Thanks hina! It's great and useful for
things I need. :D

14 October 2008, 08:19 PM   #12
Joined: 21 May 2008
Posts: 423
Last edited by Oroborus21, 14 October 2008
hey whats the difference between Great Britain and the U.K.? and how come they get to
have either choice?

im assuming off hand from my bank of knowledge that the United Kingdom is made up of GB,
Ireland, Wales and Scotland? but youre giving people the choice to pick a country inside
of that union?


if thats the case i demand an option to be California!  which is only part of the United
States via Federal constitution..and standing by itself would be larger in economy than
Scotland or Ireland, and maybe even GB.



edited cause i remembered Wales

15 October 2008, 03:30 AM   #13
Lonely Heart
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 294
Hmm.... I copied the country list from somewhere else, and didn't check all of them -.-
It has been fixed btw.
http://ariscool.com :: creates instant free web pages
-----
Being single is cool. No worrying about anyone, no obligations and best of all, no heartaches. But
you know what? If you will never get your heart broken, you will never learn to love.
-----
The best thing about loving and being hurt is that you get to know what true love really is. For as
gold is tested in fire, and so will love be perfected in pain.

22 November 2008, 06:10 AM   #14
Joined: 21 May 2008
Posts: 423
i demand that there be a country named AARDVARKIA and that i be the only citizen of it..

(so i can be at the top of the list thingy   )

22 November 2008, 12:37 PM    #15
Joined: 6 Sep 2007
Posts: 494
Last edited by Lyncheh, 22 November 2008
Just bringing up a point that some people (not including me, I like the 'United Kingdom')
get extremely irked about being lumped in as one with the United Kingdom. For instance,
why is there no "Wales" or "Scotland" option? These are not just 'states' like they have
in America, these are actual countries. That's why there were probably seperate
options in the first place, from the original list.

Take it from someone who lives here and knows.
Huge & unnecessary signature gap is huge & unnecessary. :3

Pages:  1  2


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 AM.


About Kupika    Contact    FAQs    Terms of Service    Privacy Policy    Online Safety
Copyright © 2005-2012