TWILIGHT SUCKS!!! Login to Kupika  or  Create a new account 
 

This diary entry is written by JackPower. ( View all entries )
 

TWILIGHT SUCKS!!!Category: (general)
Sunday, 8 November 2009
07:39:38 AM (GMT)
Now before you start bombarding me with hate mail let me explain. These are not
vampires! They changed what vampires are supposed to be in so many ways! First off
vampires aren't nice! They suck your blood and kill you! They dont have long dramatic
romance scenes they just want your blood. There demons who dont want to be in some
gay relationship. There not pretty boys! How are vampires supposed to look? Ill tell
you! they look like Christopher lee in the old hammer films. They changed vampires so
much in twilight it makes me sick! It's like If i made a zombie movie thats about a
zombie who doesnt eat people and all he wants to do is take a walk in the sand with
his lover. Or better yet making Hitler a fun loving guy who bakes cookies for the
young children. TWILIGHT SUCKS!!!

Comments 
‹sleeplessbeauty› says:   8 November 2009   168165  
hell ya!!!!!!
 
JackPower says:   8 November 2009   278034  
@lynxa 
Thank you at least some one agrees! 
 
‹sleeplessbeauty› says:   8 November 2009   130699  
hells ya
twilght is so bogus
 
Awesomess says:   8 November 2009   587451  
HOw could you!
but you are right........
and by the way they are nice b/c they only eat animals!!!! and they
have some bad vampires!!!!
 
JackPower says:   8 November 2009   667192  
@Awesomess 
I know thats bogus sense when did vampires eat animal!!!!???? Vampires
are supposed to eat people. the author needs to get her facts
straight!!! 
 
Izzylovesthebeatles says:   8 November 2009   370544  
wat the heck r u doing?????? this is awful ive read the twighlight
series and i loved it and who says there can't be good vampires who
are people vegitarians????
 
JackPower says:   8 November 2009   863778  
@Izzylovesthebeatles 
Name one book before twilight that has vegetarian vampires. Vegetarian
vampires thats like a zombie who likes a salad instead of flesh. 
 
StringQuartets says:   8 November 2009   906340  
Good god you people are idiots. This rant would be much more
meaningful if you spelled things right. 
Secondly, Vampire's drinking animal blood, and zombie's eating salad,
thats two totally different things. 
Since when was there a gay relationship in Twilight, that just- no.
I'm no fan of the books myself, but you Sir, are just stupid.
 
Dave12H says:   8 November 2009   719431  
You makes sense but you are incorrect when you say 'They dont have
long
dramatic romance scenes.' Vampires are probably the most sexually
based mythical creature there is. So that comment is completely wrong.
(:
Izzylovesthebeatles says:   8 November 2009   981991  
well.... there are no books like that so its still original and cool
oh and there is a book sorta like that called vampire diaries
 
JackPower says:   8 November 2009   760804  
@StringQuartets 
The vampire and zombie thing arnt really two different things. They
both eat people (I know vampires drink HUMAN blood) They are both
monsters that have been around, and they both have thing that just
shouldnt be changed. The only reason twilight became such a big hit
was because teenage girls would like it. The author didnt think about
respecting Vampires in anyway (Yes I know there not real) She changed
almost everything around for who? Girls, thats right! Find a single
straight guy who likes it. 
 
JackPower says:   8 November 2009   571597  
Your correct to a certain extent. but they mainly suduced people for
their blood not love.
 
StringQuartets says:   8 November 2009   312897  
@JackPower 
 Once again. Where in the world is there a gay relationship in these
books. 
It's supposed to be a romance, of course it's geared towards women,
don't you think?
I was not refering to the connecting that they're both monsters. Human
blood and Animal blood are similar. Human flesh, and salad, are not
similar. 
 
JackPower says:   8 November 2009   367192  
@StringQuartets 
Alright when i say GAY i mean Lame. Ok there. Once again why make a
vampire romance story and not a zombie one :D Originaly Vampirism was
supposed to be a disease, And the victims needed humon blood. now
think about it you cant give some one who needs more blood. animal
blood, now do you. 
 
StringQuartets says:   8 November 2009   403793  
 @JackPower
 Then say lame. When you refer to Edward and Bella's relationship,
calling it gay is counterproductive to your cause. It makes you sound
stupid and uninformed. 
Obviously you're trying to convince people to side with your opinion
on the matter, correct?
Originaly Vampirism was supposed to be a disease, And the victims needed humon blood. now think about it you cant give some one who needs more blood. animal blood, now do you.
Still, this gives no explanation to how human flesh can be substituted for salad. If you don't like the series, don't read it. Simple as that. I don't like the series, and therefore do not read it. I also don't make rant diary's on how 'stupid' it is. Twilight is not stupid, yes perhaps it is bland, repetitive, and gives off a mixed up sense of a decent relationship, but it is not stupid. Stephani Meyer wrote the book to entertain people, she did not write the book to accommodate other people's opinions on how Vampire romance novels should be, she wrote the book to accommodate her own opinions on how she thought vampire romance novels should be. If you have a different opinion on what Vampires should be like, then why don't you try writing a book?@JackPower
 
bittersweetsymphony says:   8 November 2009   227802  
This made me giggle. 

A lot.
 
JackPower says:   8 November 2009   312332  
@StringQuartets 
Belive it or not straight people used the word gay before homosexuals
so i can use it however i want. second The thing with the vampire and
zombie can be seen as how ridicules of an idea of a zombie eating a
salad and "vampires" from twilight are. And Stephani Meyer wrote it
for money. She knew chumps would go out and buy it and she was right!
And the reason i dont write a book is i dont want to. and also why
should i risk messing somthing up like twilight did? 
 
StringQuartets says:   8 November 2009   292861  
 @JackPower 

..Rofl, epic fail. Stop trying. 
 
‹krista ♥› says:   9 November 2009   161248  
I agree;
I think Twilight is just a soap opera, with "monsters" :U.
Same with other vampire/monster related shows like True blood, or
Vampire diaries, which to me are just a bunch of soap operas ._. .
Which takes away from the "scaryness" that the monsters are supposed
to have. u.u
 
JackPower says:   9 November 2009   686594  
@StringQuartets 
Wow couldnt think of a comeback to what i said :D lol 
 
‹(^0^)otoko;otoko_♫› says:   9 November 2009   778889  
-cough cough- no shit -cough cough-
 
StringQuartets says:   9 November 2009   420551  
 No, I figured it's a waste of energy to try and come up with
a logical response. Cleary you're deluded. 
I'm sorry, it's a horrible thing- to have no idea what you're talking
about. 

I'm going to stop now, I've got stuff to do. Have to go-...fold socks
or something.
 
Claaudiine says:   9 November 2009   203669  
STUPID BOY.

Just because you hate it and you THINK that's what vampires do than
your wrong.
Vampires don't do anything you know why?
BECAUSE THEY AREN'T FREAKING REAL!
STUPID BOY!

Making a dramatic scene about vampires and your stupid opinions. 
YOUR THE ONE THAT IS MAKING THE DRAMATIC SCENES. 
Stupid boy. 

And if you really hate Twilight than tell it to Stephanie Meyers, the
girl who made the book. 
WHY DON'T YOU SAY IT TO HER FRIGGGIN FACE!
IF YOU HATE IT SOO MUCH THAN SAY IT TO HER DON'T SAY IT TO THE
TWILIGHT LOVERS SAY IT TO STEPHANIE MEYERS. BLAME IT ON HER! SHE MADE
IT!

DURRRRRRRRR....Complain to her not us. STUPID BOY!
STOP COMPLAINING! DON'T BE EMO. STUPID BOY YEAH STUPIDDDDDD BOYYYY!
 
StringQuartets says:   9 November 2009   389427  
"@Claaudiine 
Serious overusage of the term "stupid boy" 
 
Claaudiine says:   9 November 2009   808057  
Lol!

It makes it funny like that. XDDDD
 
Claaudiine says:   9 November 2009   236221  
"@StringQuartets
Serious over usage of seriousness. 
 
Claaudiine says:   9 November 2009   453758  
"@StringQuartets
Serious over usage of seriousness. 
 
JackPower says:   9 November 2009   517696  
@Claaudiine 
First off. I'm not emo, I had to hold in saying that this book was
also for weird emo ppl. Second off tell me were she lives, buy me a
plane ticket and you got yourself a deal. Also i bet you like
twilight. at least string wasnt a fan. 
 
Claaudiine says:   9 November 2009   985163  
@JackPower

Hah, I use to like Twilight but the stupid girly fangirls were ruining
it for me.
And, I'm not going to do all that for you, your the one that hates the
book so you must hate Stephanie Meyers too...so buy your own tickets
if you want to stop the whole Twilight stuff and tell her to stop
selling the books.

And yes you are emo. Your emotionally making a big deal about this
whole twilight. 
 
Claaudiine says:   9 November 2009   518959  
@JackPower

Hah, I use to like Twilight but the stupid girly fangirls were ruining
it for me.
And, I'm not going to do all that for you, your the one that hates the
book so you must hate Stephanie Meyers too...so buy your own tickets
if you want to stop the whole Twilight stuff and tell her to stop
selling the books.

And yes you are emo. Your emotionally making a big deal about this
whole twilight. 
 
Claaudiine says:   9 November 2009   579929  
@JackPower

Hah, I use to like Twilight but the stupid girly fangirls were ruining
it for me.
And, I'm not going to do all that for you, your the one that hates the
book so you must hate Stephanie Meyers too...so buy your own tickets
if you want to stop the whole Twilight stuff and tell her to stop
selling the books.

And yes you are emo. Your emotionally making a big deal about this
whole twilight. 
 
Absolution says:   9 November 2009   108435  
It's like If i made a zombie movie
thats about a zombie who doesnt eat people and all he wants to do is
take a walk in
the sand with his lover. Or better yet making Hitler a fun loving guy
who bakes
cookies for the young children.


LOL YOU ARE AWESOME.
 
zoeeee says:   9 November 2009   699051  
absolution:
i agree :D

but since vampires don't really exist, i guess the concept could be
changed around a bit. but twilight isn't a very well written novel...
:/ robert pattinson just made it famous
 
Awesomess says:   9 November 2009   514943  
wazup its mez again
Just saying ive been very lonly and I need help....
PLEZ COMMENT!!!
IM SO LONELY!!!! 
Be caring prson and GIVE PLZ PLZ PLZ PLZ PLZ
 
‹WeaponFace♥› says:   10 November 2009   275334  
I'd rather be a shiney vampire in the sun, than a dead one in the
sun. ._.
LOL.
XD
 
thelightsgoblink says:   11 November 2009   396850  
rofl, this is so fucking good.
i completely agree :D
 
‹Jared_the_asshole› says:   11 November 2009   427562  
well actually this change in the vampires are good because then we
are not bored with the same old stuff...really who wants to read about
the same kind of vampires? and it shows that everything changes...like
the human race.
 
‹Jared_the_asshole› says:   11 November 2009   722779  
though I dont enjoy the books
 
DatGurl says:   13 November 2009   644743  
Lmao dat was my laff of da day!
 
‹{Viva}♥La♥{Vida}› says:   18 November 2009   209512  
I know, vampires Stephenie Meyer comes up with are nothing more than
Barbie doll wannabes.
 
‹{Viva}♥La♥{Vida}› says:   18 November 2009   319143  
@Izzylovesthebeatles 
Sorry, I'd believe you, but you can't even spell Twilight correctly. 
 
Izzylovesthebeatles says:   18 November 2009   846164  
it type really fast srry
 
Kirti says:   18 November 2009   374357  
True, but the myerpires in Twilight weren't in gay relationships.
They were straight relationships, which are even more boring.

I hate Bella. There was no character development with her. She starts
out stupid, whiney, and clingy, and at the end of the series she was
still stupid, whiney, and clingy.
 
RedStar says:   21 November 2009   199555  
Twilight is lame
 
‹ana's broken angel› says:   23 November 2009   869967  
your right, there not vampires, there sparkly faeries
 
‹WeaponFace♥› says:   23 November 2009   784083  
I like Twilight.
But, everyone has they're likes and dislikes and they're own
opinions.
Why is there all this fighting over flamin' opinions?!
 
Lulas67 says:   23 November 2009   809840  
OMG I LOVE JACOB BLACK HE ROCKS ACCEPT IN ECLIPSE
 
SmileCrocodile says:   23 November 2009   785263  
*facepalm*

It's a sodding book. 
Get over it you ninnies.
 
‹goodfornothing› says:   24 November 2009   761856  
what I hate most about Twilight is that it's not sold by the story or
the writing or the morals or the message or the ending or the
beginning or anything remotely close to what a book should be sold by:
it's sold by a character. 
clearly, if Edward weren't hot, the series wouldn't be nearly as big a
deal.
 
JackPower says:   31 January 2010   541405  
The lost boys > twilight
 
‹Sathanas› says:   26 February 2012   611111  
I just was randomly looking through here and read you said that gay
was used by straight people before homosexuals and that  therefore,
you could use it how ever you want to. That is true until you say you
can use it how ever you like. Gay originally meant HAPPY, NOT lame. I
agree Twilight sucks and it is the stupidest bullshit ever. But at
least use correct English. Plus, vampires were originally the Lilitu,
children of the goddess Lilith. Vampirism was also considered a curse
to the those whose ancestors committed some atrocity or themselves
were great sinners. It became a disease much later on. 

Lilith was also said to be quite the looker herself, so it wouldn't be
so far fetched to say Vampires would also be good looking, not ugly.
And if vampirism were a disease changing humans to vampires, human
emotions could develop or transfer thereby making a vampire with human
interests and emotions. This paves the way for vampire romance novels.
But they could just as easily be evil blood thirsty murderers. This is
why I love The Southern Vampire Mysteries (True Blood on HBO). The
books/show demonstrate both spectrums of the possibility of a vampire.
 
‹jesus_of_suburbia› says:   21 March 2012   856939  
Vampires are supposed to melt in the sun, not stand there glittering
like a gay disco ball.
 
JackPower says:   22 March 2012   420713  
@Hollyhorsegirl 
Amen to that 
 
‹the Gaythiest› says:   30 March 2012   230978  
 Hello, idiot.
To start, it's not that the writer of Twilight changed vampires in so
many ways. Edward Cullen and the rest of his family are just different
form what you know of vampires. Or, rather, what people have been led
to believing the 'right' definition of vampires is. Yes, Edward
sparkles. Yes, Edward drinks animal blood instead of the blood of a
human. So?

Vampires don't suck your blood and kill you. Edward doesn't, yet he is
a vampire. Vampires are not ugly, but that is just a matter of
opinion. Once again, this is just what vision of 'vampire' people have
painted over the years.
 
‹Sathanas› says :   27 June 2012   342818  
@RainbowMuffin 
Dejanna, vampires (in actual myth) ARE blood sucking monsters who want
to drain people. The goddess and the original vampire figure Lilith
was notorious for allegedly kidnapping infants and eating them. Her
children, the Lilitu, later became succubi and incubi but they
originally drank blood and raped people. 
 

 
HTML Tips

Related Entries
XxDaisyxX: Twilight
‹✖[[AntisocialButterfly]]✖›: Goth Kids Eat Emo Kids Eat Scene Kids Eat Dinosaurs Eat Hipsters. RANDOM SHIZ
Unwritten: Poetry
‹ピカチュウ♥›: Rant about profiles;
‹✖[[AntisocialButterfly]]✖›: Survey: Would YOU date a vampire??? Kupitrash


About Kupika    Contact    FAQs    Terms of Service    Privacy Policy    Online Safety
Copyright © 2005-2012